logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고단4611
신용정보의이용및보호에관한법률위반등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year

Samsung Tallon jus S7, Samsung Callon ju, which was seized.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a heart center (e) with the trade name of "E" along with mobile phone sales, and Defendant B is an employee of the said heart center.

No person other than a credit information company, credit information collection agency and credit information provider/user (hereinafter referred to as "credit information company, etc.") shall engage in business of identifying the location and contact information of a specific person, and no person shall collect, use or provide the location information of an individual or mobile object without the consent of the individual or owner thereof.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, who advertised the Internet portal site “E Helst Call F” on the Internet portal site, is in charge of counseling on the confirmation or failure of a specific person’s location or contact information, acceptance of a case, and direction-setting on the business of the said center. Defendant B, directly or through the so-called “Inquiryer”, performed the business of the said center. Defendant B, in accordance with the above A’s instructions, conspired to identify the specific person’s location or contact information, or to provide the client with the information by checking whether the specific person’s location or contact location was unknown or by identifying the person’s failure or location.

1. On January 18, 2017, Defendant A in violation of the Credit Information Use and Protection Act received a request from the client for the verification of the personal information of the party who subscribed to the telephone number “G” and the information of the subscriber, including the hearing site or residence, from the client, and ordered Defendant B, who is an employee, to identify the above contents. Defendant B requested the confirmation of the above contents to the inquirer, who was working in LEL PP, and again requested the confirmation of the above contents, and notified the client via the above A of the entry title “I” and “Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government JJ”.

As a result, Defendants are not credit information companies.

arrow