logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.14 2016고단2147 (1)
독점규제및공정거래에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

F Company shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

The provisional payment of the amount equivalent to the above fine shall be ordered.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

F Co., Ltd., Defendant A Co., Ltd., Defendant B Co., Ltd., Defendant C, Defendant D and Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) are corporations engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling the source of alley.

The Defendants were subject to pressure on cost due to the rise in prices of G Co., Ltd., H Co., Ltd., which are companies of the same industry (hereinafter “G Co., Ltd.”), I Co., Ltd., J Co., Ltd., K, K, L Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., and M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) and domestic notice (which means the paper that was unusable, and which constitutes raw materials of the pelf), and decided to engage in collusion to increase the sales price of the pelf land.

1. On May 22, 2007, the Defendants’ employees NN of Defendant A, and Defendant C’s employeesO, at the restaurant called “ Q Q” located in P at Singu, P on May 2, 2007, consulted on the price increase of H’s employees R, I’s employees S, the same industry, and I’s employees S, back to the frame of the frame (which is classified into K, B, and S, depending on the weight of paper in the back and frame) and shared the result by delivering it to other Defendants (excluding Defendant F) and G, J, K, L, M, etc., the same industry.

After that, around June 4, 2007, Defendant A’s employees T, Defendant C’s employees U, and Defendant E’s employees V agreed to increase the price per ton by taking into account the factors of the cost factor of the price of the instant G’s employees X, H’s employees Y, I’s employees Z, K’s employees AA, and M’s employees AB in the restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul. Around that time, the result is known to the other Defendants (excluding Defendant F), the same industry as the other Defendants (excluding Defendant F) and accordingly, the Defendants (excluding Defendant F) and the same industry from July 2007 to August 207.

arrow