A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C (ma, 45 years of age) are married with a couple.

피고인은 2017. 7. 13. 23:00 경 광주 북구 설죽로 노상에서 피해 자가 불상의 남자와 함께 그 남자의 집으로 들어가는 것을 목격하고 피해자에게 화가 나, 익일 00:40 경 광주 북구 D에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 귀가한 피해자에게 “ 누구에게 몸뚱이 주고 왔냐.

Chewing year, year, death, and discarded.

"At the time of drinking, the body of the victim has been made several times," and it is confirmed whether the body of the victim has been made with another male.

“In the end, the victim’s neck and panty are exceeded, the victim’s neck continues to be tight, and the victim’s neck, a wooden stick (1m, 1.4~3.5m in diameter), which is a dangerous object inside and outside, was inflicted on the victim’s hair, arms, neck, etc. at approximately 7 weeks of treatment. In the event the victim’s head, arms, neck, etc. 10 minutes in length, the victim suffered injury, such as the closure of the pel-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-wing-k

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to diagnostic certificates and photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act for the sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Act committed an assault against the victim’s body by using a tree stick without any circumstance, thereby resulting in the victim’s serious injury.

The criminal liability of the defendant is very heavy in light of the method, contents, and degree of damage of the crime.

However, the victim wanted to go back to the family and submitted a written agreement to the defendant, and even the defendant's children were present in the court, so that the defendant can return to the family.

In addition to the punishment of a fine on one occasion on around 2001, the defendant seems to have caused the crime of this case because he has lost his identity in the past.