The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

After recognizing the circumstances as indicated in its reasoning, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant of the instant facts charged, on the ground that, insofar as the Defendant did not report the change in the person in charge of accounting, the person in charge of accounting is not the Defendant but the person previously reported, even after the Defendant resigned from the preliminary candidate.

The judgment below

In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the requirements for establishment of a crime of violating the Political Fund Act, or by violating the principle of extended interpretation and prohibition of analogical interpretation, and the principle of statutory punishment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.