Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the defendant C is above two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On May 15, 2014, A was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon Friwon, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Ansan prison on May 31, 2014. On May 12, 2015, A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business in the support of the Suwon Friwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 26, 2015.

Defendant

B On May 12, 2015, upon being sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in April, 2015, due to interference with business in the support of the Suwon Friwon, the judgment became final and conclusive on May 20, 2015.

Defendant

C On May 12, 2015, upon being sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on the grounds of interference with business in the support for the development of the Suwon method, the sentence was finalized on May 20, 2015.

1. On September 2014, Defendant A, at the entrance parking lot at the military unit inside the military unit inside the Yanyang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-si, was divided into two stories: (a) on the ground that the Defendant and B, who followed the above E, did not reside in the inside and outside of the inner world and did so; (b) on the ground that the Defendant and B did not look at the inside and went back to the Gu, the Defendant and B threatened the Defendant with the knife, which was a deadly weapon in the vehicle.

Although the Defendant was threatened with a deadly weapon from E, the Defendant was present as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) against E in 2014 order 1741 at the court, at the time of Ansan-si, 2015, at the time of Ansan-si 302, the Suyang-gu, Suyang-si, 2015. The Defendant was threatened by the Defendant E at the parking lot at the entrance of the military unit inside the 9-dong, Gyeyang-gu, Ansan-gu, 2014 order 1741 at the above court, and then the prosecutor’s “the witness and B was threatened by the Defendant E at the entrance of the military unit inside the military unit inside the Suyang-gu, 2014 order 302.

‘Intimidation’ is known to the question “, and only fested to the match.”

It is necessary to respond to the Prosecutor’s “,” and there is a fact that the Prosecutor’s “Defendant (E) had been posted to the witness and B the knife, which is a dangerous thing in this section.

“No....” and the prosecutor’s “at the time.....” answer to the question.