1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, 1), among the lands listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table Nos. 1 and 2, indicated in the annexed Form No. 1 (A).

1. In full view of the facts of recognition as Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including a number with several numbers), the land listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table Nos. 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the land Nos. 1 and 2") were owned by the plaintiff. The defendant Eul owned the building listed in paragraph 3 of the attached Table Nos. 6 of the attached Table Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and owned the building listed in paragraph 6 of the attached Table Nos. 6 of the attached Table Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7, connected each of these points to the appraiser F of this court, and the overall purport of this court's measurement and appraisal with regard to appraiser F of the attached Table Nos. 4 and 5, and the part of the attached Table Nos. 6 of the attached Table Nos. 1 and 7, and the part of the attached Table Nos. 36 of the attached Table Nos. 3 and 6 of the land owned by the defendant No. 3. 60.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the land of this case is owned by the Plaintiff, and the Defendants occupied and used the land without any specific title.

As such, with respect to Defendant C and D, the Plaintiff’s removal of the part in possession against Defendant B, including the removal of the buildings and fences, owned or managed with respect to the said part, and the transfer of all of the instant land, and with respect to Defendant E, the removal of the greenhouse and warehouse built, and the occupied part of the land.