The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment, although it was sufficiently found guilty of the facts charged in this case.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant is a driver of Cschtonton car. On April 8, 2011, the Defendant driving the said vehicle at the front of the drinking-house parking lot in the name of “E” located in Dacheon-si on the surface of “E” and moving the said vehicle to “creamed”, the Defendant did not discover the victim F (53 years old) who was going to get a taxi from the aftermasting Defendant’s driver’s vehicle due to occupational negligence, and did not discover the victim’s f (53 years old) that was going to get a taxi from the aftermath of the said vehicle. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to drive the said vehicle to go to the road by taking the victim back to the right side of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injuries, such as a cage cage cage cage cages, etc. which require treatment for approximately six weeks, but failed to immediately stop and escape without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

3. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty on the ground that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, on the ground that the victim’s statement on the part on which the Defendant’s second right wheels contacted was sent to the scene at the time, is somewhat different from the victim’s statement, H’s statement that the police officer was sent to the scene at the time, the police officer did not discover the second wheels station in the part in which the victim was placed, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, on the ground that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor was not sufficient to acknowledge the facts charged of the instant case when he was sent to the taxi.

4. Judgment of the court below

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, i.e., victim F., the victim F.