beta
Text
1. A resolution to appoint C as a manager at the B management body meeting held by the Defendant on June 11, 2012, and D as an executive secretary is adopted.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The business building B in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si (hereinafter “instant business building”) is an aggregate building consisting of a divided store that is the object of several divided ownership.
B. The designated parties indicated in the separate sheet of the Selection and Nonparty C, including the Plaintiff (Appointed Party, hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff) and the non-party C are the sectional owners of the instant commercial building.
C. On June 1, 2012, the Defendant notified the sectional owners of the instant commercial building of convening a management body meeting. On June 11, 2012, the Defendant held a management body meeting and resolved to appoint C as a manager and D as an auditor (hereinafter “instant resolution”).
At the time of the notice of convening the above management body C shall be in addition to attached Forms 111 and 112 under the ground of the commercial building of this case.
2. Newly Inserted by Presidential Decree No. 1570, Jun. 7, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 11120, Jun. 7, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 11120, Jun. 1, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 11200, Jun. 1, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 11120, Jan. 1, 201; Presidential Decree No. 22035, Feb. 20, 201; Presidential Decree
E. Selection G: Attached Form 206-2 other than the instant commercial building at the time of the notice of convening the management body meeting
2. On June 5, 2012, 206-2, 1/10 of the share No. 206-2 was transferred to her husband H.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 15 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s main defense of safety brought a lawsuit against the Defendant that “the Defendant confirms that the resolution was null and void at the meeting of the B management body held on April 29, 2010, which was held by the Defendant as a manager,” and the Defendant holds a meeting of the management body and makes a resolution of this case, depending on whether the validity of the resolution of this case satisfies the requirements for protecting the rights of the said lawsuit.