logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2021.03.04 2020고단3674
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On February 23, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the support of the Suwon Frigwon method.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant was a double parking in the front underground parking lot of Ansan-si apartment C, Ansan-si, a member state of Ansan-si, with alcohol content of 0.087% under the influence of alcohol around August 28, 2020.

D Corland also driven a car at a speed of about 3 meters and driving a car at a speed.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving and inquiry of the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (Attachment of a copy of the previous summary order) and application of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is the defendant's previous conviction for the reason of sentencing, interval from time and time, drinking volume and driving frequency at the time of the instant case, drinking driving distance, driving distance of drinking, the defendant's act of driving, the fact that the above substitute engineer went home by using his/her proxy, and the fact that the instant case occurred in the course of his/her vehicle parking and then the defendant tried to park again by displaying his/her vehicle, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relationship, occupation, and conditions after

arrow