logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.02.11 2014고정32
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in the manufacturing business of plastic recyclable materials with the trade name of “stock company B” in the Gu and America.

When a foreigner is to be employed, a person having the status of sojourn eligible for employment in Korea shall be employed under the conditions as prescribed by the Presidential Decree.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was identical from March 25, 2013.

4. The same year between April 1, 2013 and April 1, 2013, Indonesia D (D, 36 years of age) that entered the Republic of Justice as sojourn status non-professional employment from the Minister of Justice.

4. During the period of 17.17., Indonesia E (E, 37 years of age) with the same nationality entered in the same manner as above was employed at the intervals of KRW 1.6 million per month, respectively.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as above, violated the above A’s business operation in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a notice of decision on examining an immigration offender, a copy of business registration certificate, a certificate of foreign employment and a statement of foreigner, and a copy of comprehensive inquiry

1. Article 94 Subparag. 9 and Article 18(3) of the former Immigration Control Act (Amended by Act No. 12195, Jan. 7, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply); Articles 94 Subparag. 9 and 18(3) of the former Immigration Control Act; Articles 99-3 Subparag. 2, 94 Subparag. 9, and 18(3) of the former Immigration Control Act;

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above, each of the orders for provisional payment (defendants);

arrow