Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 24, 2016, the Defendant driven a car B A62.0 on June 24, 2016, and driven a two-lane road in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at a speed of two-lanes from the remote distance protection area of the Doe 1dong Community Service Center at the Doe 1dong Community Service Center to find it impossible to identify it as the reverse three-lane.
In such cases, the defendant who drives a motor vehicle has a duty of care to avoid accidents by driving the motor vehicle with the view of the front door and the safe driving of the motor vehicle in compliance with the traffic signal.
Although the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and changed the traffic signal to a stop signal, the Defendant, while passing through the above shooting distance intersection in violation of the signal, was in conflict with the E-wheeled Vehicle operated by the victim D, who entered the above shooting distance intersection and left left or left to the left pursuant to the new code, while driving the yellow signal on the side facing the signal.
After all, the Defendant suffered 6 prudent injury due to the diagnosis of climatic blood transfusion, etc., which is open to the victim by negligence in the course of business as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A traffic accident report;
1. Each photograph;
1. Efabbbbling images to caps;
1. The point of injury in judgment: The application of each written diagnosis to statutes;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Depository Punishment);
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the defendant violates the signal at the private distance intersection.
Taking into account the fact that the defendant's negligence is heavy, and the victim suffers a serious injury that can remain in the aftermath, such as recognition disorder, etc.
However, considering the fact that the defendant's driver's vehicle is covered by the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance and the victim's damage seems to have been expanded because he/she did not wear a fitness.
Besides, the age, character, character and environment of the defendant, and