logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.04.05 2013고단381
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 2013, the Defendants conspired to take money and other valuables by threatening the victim, even if they were to investigate the her husband, who was requested by the victim D (n, 42 years of age) and went to the Defendant, who was the husband of the said E, and received all the compensation.

At around 19:00 on January 7, 2013, the Defendants called “G” at the main point of “G” located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in shift to the victim using a mobile phone, and do not leave to pay KRW 10 million to the victim by no later than 2:00 per day. We report money to those who do work, and if you do not pay money, you will not find any school. If you do not know, we will not leave the husband. Considering that the husband might be bound, and since the husband did not have any original contract, the Defendants said that the cost of KRW 13 million, including the cost of KRW 3 million, is deposited by no later than 2:00 p.m. per day.”

The Defendants threatened the victim by the above method, and transferred 13 million won to the Defendant’s bank account in the name of the Defendant B at around the 8th of the same month from the victim frightened.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

(a) No person who manages or has processed personal information shall divulge personal information he/she becomes aware of in the course of performing his/her duties or provide it to another person without authority;

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant, upon receiving a request from D to inform Ha of the address of H, which was in a bad relationship with her husband, with E, the Defendant, who was working as an insurance solicitor, had the said D known her address, etc. by accessing I and other insurance companies’ computer systems, and had the said D processed customer information by advertising her work as an insurance solicitor.

On December 24, 2012, the Defendant printed out the subscription form of H's automobile insurance by accessing the I's computer system from the (ju) K office working for the Defendant located in Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul to a computer.

arrow