The defendant connects the plaintiff with each point of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the 456§³ in Osan-si D, Osan-si.

In full view of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the plaintiff is the owner of 456 square meters D. D (hereinafter "the land in this case"). The defendant is the owner of a general steel structure and one-story building (hereinafter "the building in this case") on the ground of 92.82 square meters on board among the land in this case, which connected each point in sequence of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the land in this case. The plaintiff and the defendant were the owner of a general steel structure and one-story building on the ground of 92.82 square meters of land in this case (hereinafter "the building in this case"). The plaintiff and the defendant delivered rent 2,640,000 square meters of land in this case (hereinafter "the land in this case") to the defendant, who did not express his intent to modify the lease contract (hereinafter "the lease contract in this case"), and the defendant did not pay rent to the defendant until 208,2007.

According to these facts of recognition, the instant lease agreement was terminated on August 13, 2020 by the Plaintiff’s expression of intention of termination.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the Defendant, who occupies the land occupied by the instant building without title through the ownership of the instant building, is obligated to remove the instant building and deliver the land occupied by the instant owner to the Plaintiff, who is the owner of the instant land.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.