1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs, which orders additional payment.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases.

2. A statement of calculation of the amount of damages in the attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by that of the attached Form of this judgment.

The 4th to 16th of the first instance judgment shall be dismissed as follows.

“B) Maximum working age and income: The Plaintiff’s maximum working age and income are recognized to be 60 won as the urban wage of the ordinary person and 80 won until the age of 60. From October 17, 2013 to February 10, 2014, which is the date of the instant accident, the Plaintiff could obtain KRW 2,987,833 per month, which is more than the urban daily wage. Thus, according to the evidence No. 21, the Plaintiff’s statement of evidence No. 21, Dec. 11, 2013; KRW 165,40, Jan. 13, 2014; KRW 2,923,150, and KRW 2,26,780, respectively, and the Plaintiff’s payment of the deceased’s wage and salary income was recognized to be less than the amount of KRW 3,000,000,000,000 paid to the Plaintiff’s wage and salary income account for 13 months.