logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.05.24 2013고단543
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

, however, from the date when this judgment has become final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On September 13, 2012, A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year by imprisonment with prison labor for fabrication of private documents at the Seoul Central District Court on September 13, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 21, 2012.

Defendant

A around November 8, 2011, upon receipt of a request from E to “the intention to leave the Republic of Korea without permission on one’s own,” and around that time, I proposed that Defendant B, the tugboat “H” engineer of G, which was introduced through F, which was known to the general public, deliver E to Japan. Defendant B transferred Defendant C’s proposal to Defendant C, the crew of B, who is a seafarer of B, under the B’I, under the examples of “H”.

Defendant

A around November 19, 201, around 19, 201, around 201, after having requested the Japanese government to exchange Eul with the Defendant B and C only once at the same time, and the Defendant B and C accepted it.

Accordingly, at around 21:00 on November 19, 201, Defendant C sent E to “I” and “I” at the store of a player located inside the main unit of the Dongg Industrial Complex located in the Sung-gu, Chang-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and Defendant B, as an engineer of H, around 2:10 on November 21, 201, arrived at the port of Msan Port Port on November 22, 201, in the same manner as “I”, in the case of “I”; and Defendant B, as an engineer of H” in subparagraph 2:10 on November 21, 201, arrived at the port of Msan Port on the same day as “I”;

The Defendants, in collusion with E, etc., had a citizen of the Republic of Korea departed from Japan without undergoing a departure inspection by an immigration control official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. A written accusation;

1. Korean forced departure, delivery of trends in violation of the Entry and Departure Management Act, telephone details, detailed statement of savings deposit transactions, status of tugboats out of a port, crew list, response to a request for investigation cooperation, response to the provision of financial transaction information, details of account transactions, and inquiries into individual entry or departure;

1.Each.

arrow