The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal lies in the fact that the Defendant was pushed ahead of one another for a minor reason with the victim. However, the Defendant did not go beyond the victim’s bridge and did not go beyond the victim’s bridge.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found the charge guilty has affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the defendant was aware of the fact that he was damaged by the victim's bridge at the end of the trial; however, the victim argued that the victim's bridge was blicked by another person around the victim's bridge. However, the victim blicked on the victim's bridge that he was blicked by the victim's blick up and blicked up, and made a detailed and consistent statement from an investigative agency to the court below, that there was no other person in the surroundings, and that there was no other person's fighting between the two people in the vicinity, and ② the defendant also expressed that he was blicked by the initial police that the victim was blicked by the victim's bridge, and that there was no specific statement that the surrounding person was blicked by the victim's bridge and did not appear in the prosecutor's office.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.