logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.11.26 2020고정557
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of the BA and C as the instructor of the BAA, and C as the driver of the office of the victim D(n, 46 years old).

After retirement, there was a dispute over wage issues.

1. At around 16:30 on August 19, 2019, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, entered the “G” office operated by the victim of the building F of the building E of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, divided the password into the “G office,” and opened the two-story office doors in hand, cut off by hand, and cut off the two-story office doors of the multi-household building, and read “packer has a drawing of money by means of drawing a person, the year, the president of the son, the president of the son,” and caused the peace of the office structure where the victim works.

2. The Defendant caused the damage of property by setting up an entrance on the ground that the victim does not open the entrance of the office around that time.

In addition, the entrance door was set up several times, and the office door was damaged by digging out the office door of 750,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H;

1. Each police statement of D and H with each police officer's statement, report on internal investigation (Attachment to a photo of the victim's entrance), internal investigation report (Attachment to a written statement of acceptance of the victim's entrance), investigation report (Attachment to a photo of the victim's office's front door and a photo of the damaged part) [the defendant is all attached to the entrance and exit of the office in the front page of the victim's office, stating that there was no act as stated in the facts of the crime, and that there was no act as stated in the facts of the crime, but it is found guilty of the facts of the crime in light of the witness's respective

1. Relevant Articles 319(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine for the crime, the choice of a punishment, and the choice of a fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow