logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.24 2014고정5334
근로기준법위반등
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

2. From June 15, 2012 to April 15, 2014, the Defendant retired 1,69,676 won (i.e., wages of 82,00 won) and retirement allowances of 3,54,670 won (i.e., wages of 813,083 won) and 3,544,670 won (i.e., wages of 814,00 won) and 2.m. to 2.36,00 won (i.e., wages of 2,07,000 won) and 3,54,000 won (i.e., wages of 3,190,000 won) and 2.m. to 3,065,00 won and 2.m. to 3,065,00 won and 2.m. to 3,196,00 won and 4,000 won;

This is a crime falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act and Articles 44 subparag. 1 and 9 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act and the proviso of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act. According to the records of this case, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K have been prosecuted after the institution of this case.

arrow