logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.06.14 2015고단712
저작권법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant B is the vice president of C, Defendant D is the representative director of A, Defendant E is the head of the design team of the A, Defendant C is the corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing industrial machinery, etc., and Defendant A is the corporation established for the purpose of designing ships, etc.

A. Defendant B, Defendant D, and Defendant E Co., Ltd. entered into a design and manufacture contract with I on May 31, 201 with 2,000 tons of marine community, and entered into a design service contract with A on September 19, 201 and requested A Co., Ltd to design 2,00 tons of the basic drawing.

Before manufacturing J’s 2,00 tons plug, the Defendants conspiredd to prepare a design drawing in a way that partial revision was made based on the victim’s design drawing, namely, using the design drawing of K Co., Ltd., which was the designer at the time of the production of C’s 2,00 tons plug.

Accordingly, from September 201 to February 201, Defendant E infringed on the victim’s copyright by manufacturing the basic map of the 12,000 tons of clocks and preparing the second derivative copyrighted works at the Defendant’s office located in Ulsan-gu G G building H, Ulsan-gu, and the victim’s design drawings stored in the computer, which is an important technology of cricks, after cutting out the victim’s design drawings, which is the Crick’s main technology, the connection part of the brack support group, and the connection part of the back part of the support group, and correcting part of the upper end of the cracks.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to infringe the copyright of the victim.

B. Defendant A, at the above date, at the place, Defendant A, the representative director of the Defendant, and E, the head of the design team, committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business.

(c)

Defendant

C. Stock Company

arrow