logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.14 2018고단7059
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 6, 2018, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) on the street in front of the “Crewing point” located in Heungdong-gu, Youngdong-gu; and (b) on the street, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home to the police station by the police station E and patrolmen assigned to the Gerungdong-dong Police Station D police box called the “Isk to return home” after receiving the 112 report, the Defendant called “Isk to go home” and “Isk to know.”

Therefore, in order to have the police officers voluntarily recommended the defendant to return home to another case, the police officers confirmed that the defendant was in India, and attempted to operate the vehicle by getting on the patrol car 55, and assaulted about five minutes, such as to put the left side of the patrol vehicle in front of the front of the patrol vehicle, obstructing the operation of the patrol vehicle on the floor, and interfere with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of report 112.

2. 업무방해 피고인은 2018. 11. 6. 23:45경 제1항 기재 행위로 인하여 후송된 용인시 기흥구 G에 있는 ‘ 병원’ 응급실에서, 술에 취하여 피해자인 간호사 H의 진료를 거부하며 피해자 H에게 “씨발년아, 내가 뭘 잘못했냐”라는 등의 욕설을 하고 이를 제지하러 온 피해자인 원무과직원 I에게 “씨발놈아”라는 등의 욕설을 하고 소리를 지르고 위 병원 대기실에서 담배를 피우는 등의 방법으로 약 1시간 15분 동안 위력으로 피해자들의 진료 및 병원 응급실 관리 업무를 방해하였다.

3. On November 7, 2018, the Defendant of obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) at the place specified in Paragraph (2) around 01:00; and (b) at the place specified in Paragraph (2) of this Article, the Defendant intending to have one person sent at a Do police box to the police box, who was reported 112; and (c) the police officer assigned to the Gain Police Station, who was dispatched to the police box, and the assistant K arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with business on the grounds as stated in Paragraph (2) and attempted to take the Defendant into account as a left

arrow