logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.11.22 2017구합22337
관리처분계획취소
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 22, 2005, the Mayor of Busan Metropolitan City publicly announced Liber in Busan Metropolitan City, which designated and publicly announced as K Housing Redevelopment Improvement Zone (hereinafter “instant rearrangement Zone”).

B. On June 29, 2005, the head of Busan Special Metropolitan City, the head of Busan Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “the head of the Seogjin-gu”) approved the establishment of the Defendant, which is a housing redevelopment project association under the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017; hereinafter “former Act”). The Defendant’s articles of incorporation has the area of the project district of 57,605 square meters.

C. On April 26, 2006, the Mayor of Busan Metropolitan City publicly announced N, and publicly announced the change of the area of the rearrangement zone of this case as 57,557.1 square meters (4m2) on December 20, 2006, but publicly announced the change of the designation as 57,543m2 (14m2) square meters (14m2) on December 20, 2006, the area of the rearrangement zone of this case as 57,543m2 (14m2). Since then the Busan Metropolitan City publicly announced P on July 1, 2015, the change of the designation was publicly announced as 58,113.1m2 (570m2)

On January 20, 2016, the Defendant obtained approval of the project implementation plan from the head of the Busan District Office (hereinafter “project implementation plan,” “project implementation plan,” “authorization”), and the period from February 29, 2016 to April 28, 2016, the Defendant applied for parcelling-out from the Plaintiffs, who are the owners of land, etc. in the instant improvement zone, to the extent that the Plaintiffs did not apply for parcelling-out, but the Plaintiffs did not apply for parcelling-out.

E. On August 30, 2016, the Defendant passed a resolution to select R as the president of the partnership with the consent of 243 members, among 304 members, from among 402 members, at the special general meeting. On December 29, 2016, at the ordinary meeting convened by R, the Defendant passed a resolution to approve the formulation of the management and disposition plan at the ordinary meeting convened by R.

F. On April 13, 2017, the Defendant obtained approval from the head of Busan Jin-gu head of the Gu.

(G) On April 19, 2017, the Defendant is a building. Since then, the Busan Metropolitan City public notice SP (hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”).

arrow