The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although the Defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim G or H, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's duly adopted and investigated evidence, i.e., the victims' statements consistent with the facts charged, i.e., the defendant's statements, the circumstances that the defendant and the victim G are drinking each other at the time, and the process that led to each other's complaints after committing the crime, ii) the statements of J, K, and N are consistent with the victims' statements, iii) the victims' respective injury diagnosis reports against the victims, and photographs taken of each injured part, i.e., the victims' credibility of each injury diagnosis report prepared by each doctor just because it is difficult for the victims to deny the credibility of each injury diagnosis report prepared by each doctor just as the defendant alleged in the facts charged, iv) the defendant admitted all the facts charged in this case in the court of the court below, without any circumstance to suspect the voluntariness, and otherwise, it is not recognized that the defendant inflicted the injury on the victims as stated in the facts charged in this case.

B. As stated in the instant facts charged, the Defendant suffered injury from the victims during the process of causing injury to the victims, agreed with the victim H, and the Defendant is subject to economic difficult circumstances.