logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.27 2017나78621
기타(금전)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of the following items, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In Part 7, “The facts found in the preceding” in Part 2, “each entry of Category A 13, 22 through 24, 28, 29 (including paper numbers), and Category B 2 through 13, 18, and 20 (including paper numbers),” shall be added to “the following.”

In principle, in a case where there is an agreement with the client as to the remuneration for the handling of delegated affairs of the attorney’s lawsuit, the attorney-at-law who completed the delegated affairs may claim the full amount of the agreed fee, barring any special circumstance, barring any special circumstance. However, the attorney-at-law who has completed the delegated affairs can claim the full amount of the agreed fee. However, in light of the client’s relationship from the ordinary lawsuit, the circumstances leading up to the conclusion of the case, the amount of the case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s progress and difficulty, the degree of effort, the amount of the case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s fee rules, and other circumstances revealed in the pleading’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s attorney’s case’s case’s case’s case’s defect.

arrow