beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.
Reasons
1. Acknowledgement of the scope of judgment of this court and judgment of the first instance;
A. In the first instance court, the plaintiffs filed a claim against the defendant for the principal claim for the purchase of the real property listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and the defendant filed a claim against the plaintiffs for the counterclaim against the removal of each real property listed in the separate sheet No. 2, 3, and 4, delivery of the real property listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and return of unjust enrichment. The court of first instance dismissed the plaintiffs' principal claim and the defendant's claim for the removal of the real property listed in the separate sheet No. 4, and ruled that
In this regard, the plaintiffs did not appeal against the part against the plaintiff among the principal claim and the counterclaim claim. The scope of the court's judgment is limited to the part of the plaintiffs' principal claim and the removal of each real estate listed in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the attached list, the delivery of the real estate listed in Paragraph 1 of the attached list, and the counterclaim for return of unjust enrichment.
B. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and therefore, the same is cited by the main sentence of Article 420
2. The remaining parts of the first instance court’s 5th 18th 18th 5th 1st 5th 19th 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 19th 1st 6th 17 through 19th 19th 19th 6th 1st 1st 1st 200, and the following is added. The plaintiffs occupy the land of this case without the title to possess each of the buildings of this case after the termination of the instant lease contract. Therefore, the plaintiffs are obliged to remove each of the buildings of this case from the defendant and deliver the land of this case to the defendant, and pay the money calculated at the rate of KRW 950,000 per month from November 20, 2016 to the completion date of the delivery of the land of this case.