(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.11.23 2017고정437

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.11.23 2017고정437

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 15, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven by a vehicle with B rocketing and another car and driven by Gumi-si C, while driving a four-lane road in front of D in front of D and driving a four-lane road along the four-lane four-lane four-lane radius from the malle-distance distance from the malle-distance side of D in front to the D hospital.

It is the vicinity of the intersection where traffic is frequent.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely intern to prevent accidents in advance, so as not to impede the normal traffic of other motor vehicles in the opposite direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to turn to the left from the four-distance side of the Cerrithal Road, which was driven by the victim E (I am, 37 years old) to the front part of the driver's vehicle in front of the left part of the driver's vehicle of the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant suffered from occupational negligence the victim E with injury, such as the pipe and tension of the part of the blue part, the blue base and tension, the blue blue blue in the blue part, the victim G ( South, the 7 years old) boarding after the damaged vehicle, requiring approximately two-day medical treatment, and the brue and tension of the brue part of the blue part, the brue and tension of the face, the damage of the brue of face, the brue of the brue, the damage of the brue of the victim H (the 5 years old, the 5 years old) who was seated after the damaged vehicle for about two-day medical treatment.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act damaged the property equivalent to KRW 3,256,00 in total, including the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle in front of the damaged vehicle due to occupational negligence, such as Paragraph 1.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act: (a) drive a rocketing car, one’s own, without mandatory insurance, at the same time and place as paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement to E:

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.07.16 2014고정553

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.15 2016고단1106

-부산지방법원 2019.11.27 2019고단4739

-대전지방법원 2016.03.31 2016고단25

-광주지방법원 2016.08.25 2015고단3400