logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.09.27 2013고정1165
재물손괴등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, fifty thousand won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant caused interference with business and damage to property, etc., of Pyeongtaek B buses were parked not only on the vehicular road in front of the garage in Busan Shipping Daegu C but also on the delivery, and it was believed that the passage of the people is difficult.

On June 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on June 24, 2013, while returning home under the influence of alcohol, reported that the above B buses were parked as above; and (b) the Defendant was denied the said bus to the victim D (the age of 61).

그러자 피고인은 화가 난다는 이유로 같은 날 23:00경부터 23:40경까지 위 차고지 앞에 있던 피해자가 관리하는 시가를 알 수 없는 라바콘 1개를 발로 걷어차고, 주변에 있던 위 B 버스기사들에게 “야, 씨발놈들이 왜 여기다 차를 댔느냐.”라고 욕을 하고 주먹으로 때릴 것처럼 위협을 하였다.

In addition, the defendant had had the victim avoid the location of the vehicle by threateninging the victim to "I will not know one food," and had the victim go on the front of the garage."

In addition, it was impossible to enter the 4th bus with the operation of the B, as the above garage.

As a result, the defendant damaged the property managed by the victim, and interfered with the victim's parking guidance service by force.

2. On June 25, 2013, around 23:54 on June 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s face from the victim F (37 years of age) who was a police officer in charge of a police box called out after receiving 112 report as stated in paragraph (1) in the presence of a large number of residents and the article B around the garage as indicated in paragraph (1); and (b) requested the victim to delete the victim’s face without permission; (c) accordingly, the Defendant refused such request, stating that the victim “Isphersp will be sphere and sphere with the public.”

3. On June 25, 2013, the Defendant, who interfered with business, is identical to paragraphs (1) and (2).

arrow