logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.10.05 2018고단3179
공무원자격사칭등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant misrepresentation of a public official qualification is not a public official or Gu office sanitation.

On May 2018, the Defendant presented to him a certificate of access to a restaurant operated by D in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, as a witness at a “E” shop operated by D at around 11:00 on the end of the end of the end of May, 2018, and presented it to him as “A public official, who is a public official of the office of North Korea-gu, and was inspected by a civil petition,” and the Defendant entered the shop of the above marina branch.

The Ministry has set up a department and inspected whether the obligation for sanitary management has been fulfilled.

Accordingly, the defendant misrepresented the public official's qualification and exercised his authority ex officio.

2. Compulsory indecent acts;

A. A. On June 5, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime around 20:40 on June 5, 2018, while he/she saw the victim D (V, 53 years old) as stated in paragraph (1) around 20:40 on June 5, 2018 at the shop of “E” (E) where he/she performed drinking together with the victim, he/she has a sense of view for the victim.

D. The victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's.

On the other hand, the victim's face was able to become the victim's victim's face and the victim's knife was the victim's knife with the victim's knife.

B. Around June 5, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime around 22:21 on June 5, 2018, and around 22:21 on June 5, 2018, around 22:21, the Defendant would not hold a house if he did not inform the victim of the key.

“The victim,” and the victim, who voluntarily withdrawed the kis even kis of the Defendant’s kisc in the buck, and kisc in that kisc in that kisc, and kisc in that kisc in that kisc in that kisc in that kisc in that kisc in that kisc in that kisc in that kisc in

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (in cases of forced indecent conduct, append a photograph by cutting down a video file and a major head of a course) and by cutting CCTVs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow