The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Crane XG vehicle volume.

On September 27, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 16:20 and got left at a speed of about 10km per hour while driving the vehicle at about 10km, 221-0, Shaz 101, the Shari-ro 101, which is the Shari-ro 101.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to give an advance notice of change of course by operating a direction, etc., and to change lanes in the future and after the driving.

However, in order to make a left-hand turn without neglecting this, the Defendant, by the negligence of changing the two lanes from the two lanes to the one lane, caused the victim D (Influence, 27 years old) driving by the one lane, who is straight along the one lane, was shocked by the front side of the rac vehicle E in front of the 27 years old driver’s seat by the side of the above driver’s seat.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dynasium, tension, etc. for four weeks due to the foregoing occupational negligence.

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution;

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents);

B. The victim D’s expression of intention not to punish the victim D after the indictment of this case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)