Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 1, 2012, at around 09:20 on October 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the Defendant that “D’s operation “D” of the Victim C, located in Si-si, Si-si; and (b) expressed to the Defendant that “Is the market to open the door?” and subsequently, the Defendant continued to engage in funeral even after the Defendant went out of the main place, and (c) expressed to the Defendant that “Is off,” “Is off,” the Victim “Is off, Isle, Isle, Isle, Isle, Is off, Isle,” which are kept in the main place for persons with disabilities.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's market price of 150,000 won by destroying one copy of the cooling and glass door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Selection of Penalty concerning the Crime. Article 366 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's assertion of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is in a state of mental disability due to the detention of the defendant at the time of the crime of this case.

However, according to the records, although the fact that the defendant was drunk at the time of the crime of this case is acknowledged, in light of the background, means and methods of the crime of this case, the defendant's behavior before and after the crime of this case, etc., it is not recognized that the defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions, and thus, the above assertion is rejected.

The Institute of Jind Co., Ltd.