logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.04.20 2017고정443
액화석유가스의안전관리및사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,400,00.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates and lives the place of business of selling liquefied petroleum gas in the trade name of the D cooperative in the Isan City.

A liquefied petroleum gas business operator shall maintain facilities for filling facilities, collective supply facilities, sales facilities, places of business, storage facilities, or gas appliance manufacturing facilities of liquefied petroleum gas in compliance with facility standards and technical standards (excluding cases of transport in compliance with an order of a supplier, and store them in the container storage room by classifying charging machines and residual gas containers, except for transport in accordance with the order of the supplier).

1. On August 11, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 High 443,” stored liquid petroleum gas containers containing LPG from around 00:20 to around 01:00, at the street in the workplace located in the following cities, from around 00:20 to around 01:00, in two vehicles loaded in E and Fpoter.

2. On August 7, 2017, the Defendant, “2018 Highly 20, the Defendant, from around 22:17, to around 02:25, kept the cryp vehicle loaded with the cryp vehicle at the street of the place of business listed in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the police officers against the accused;

1. Accusations against those who violate the safety control and business of liquefied petroleum gas and reports on the detection thereof;

1. Application of a written statement, evidentiary materials leaving containers alone (D cooperatives), and related photographic Acts and subordinate statutes to each suspect;

1. Article 68 subparagraph 7 of the relevant Act and Articles 68 and 32 (1) (excluding punishment) of the Safety Control and Business Act for each liquefied petroleum gas subject to the option of punishment for criminal facts [the Defendant, while running the 24-hour business, keeps shock equipment, etc. on the truck in order to ensure the immediate delivery of the phone received from customers, so the Defendant kept the shock equipment, etc. on the truck, so attached Table 6 of Article 12 subparagraph 3 of the Enforcement Rule of the said Act “Standards for facilities, technology, and inspection of container storage facilities to be installed in the place of business of an liquefied petroleum gas filling business entity and liquefied petroleum gas filling business entity (Article 12 (1) 3 and (2), Article 13 (1) 2, Article 51 (4) 3, Article 52 (2) 3, and Article 53 (3) 3 of the Enforcement Rule of the said Act];

1.(b)(a) The order of the Claimant set out in subparagraph (a).

arrow