logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고단1691
사기등
Text

The crimes listed in the annexed Table Nos. 1 through 5 of the judgment of the defendant and each of the crimes listed in the annexed Table No. 19 through 85 of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten (10) years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court on October 24, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 1 of the same year.

【Criminal Facts】

"2016 Highest 1691"

1. Fraud;

A. On April 2015, the Defendant concluded that “The Defendant, at G Research Institute located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 2015, had a friendly Gu with high-level investment information, and invested KRW 500,000,000 if it invests KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, would be 70,000,000 won.”

However, in fact, even if the Defendant, at the time, did not know of the investment information and did not think of the Defendant’s profit from the investment, even if the Defendant received the investment funds from the victim in the amount equivalent to KRW 40,000,000,000,000 from the lending company and the amount equivalent to KRW 50,000,000,000.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the same day as the investment money.

B. On April 19, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim stating that “I shall be hospitalized at the hospital, but I shall be reimbursed with money. I will pay the said money by using the dividends of the paid-in and invested money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant thought to be used as a debt repayment or gambling fund, and her mother did not have been hospitalized in the hospital. At the time, her mother did not have any intent or ability to repay the debt even if her mother borrowed the above money from the victim with a debt of KRW 40 million and a debt of KRW 50 million to the lending company.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received eight million won from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant on the same day under the pretext of borrowing money from the victim.

C. On August 15, 2015, the Defendant “The Philippines.”

arrow