logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.02.17 2015고단5291
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around November 28, 2015, at around 00:30, the Defendant did not pay food and drink at the “C” drinking house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and did not pay the amount of food. Around November 28, 2015, the Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112, attempted to listen to the instant circumstances of the victim D (37 tax) who is the police officer belonging to the patrol unit of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Police Station 112, who was called to the site, and the two employees and the president of the company, etc., were salved by the Defendant, while the Defendant was able to listen to the details of the instant case, “the victim’s fat of the fish febbbbbbbbb, and there were children who are likely to land on the instant febbb

2. When the Defendant was given a warning to keep the Defendant in mind that he would no longer take a bath at the above date, time, and place, the Defendant was notified that the Defendant could be arrested as a flagrant offender on suspicion, such as the Defendant’s failure to arrest the Defendant’s chest with the Defendant’s knife by asking for his identification card, leaving the Defendant to arrest the Defendant’s knife knife knife knif, and interfering with the performance of official duties. In addition, it was notified that the Defendant could be arrested as a flagrant offender on suspicion.

새끼야! 아들 뻘도 안 되는 새끼가 어디서 죽을라고

In this regard, it was assaulted that the victim's breast part was tightly pushed up twice with the victim's finger.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate 112 reporting management work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

112 Application of the 112 Report Processing Statement, duplicate of the receipt and processing status of the case, and Acts and subordinate statutes on the job site of the patrol team in the Dong;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Each of the crimes in this case is committed even though the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act had a record of punishment several times, including the record of punishment for the same crime.

arrow