The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal prevents the Defendant from taking out the strike until the payment of the price of the strike to C, and there is a fact between C and C taking out the past strike. Therefore, the lower court’s judgment convicting the Defendant of the facts charged in the instant case is erroneous in matters of mistake of facts, even though there was no false report.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, namely, C had obtained the Defendant’s permission at the time of the transfer from June 2008 to December 2008 at the court below, and the Defendant stated to the effect that all three times he transferred the proceeds of the transfer from the Defendant’s account to the Defendant’s account, and the Defendant did not receive KRW 1 million from the investigation agency. However, according to the Defendant’s deposit transaction, the Defendant alleged that the amount of the proceeds of the transfer was 2,92,950 won from September 23, 2008 under the name of I’s business G G 2,950, and the amount was 3,500,000 won from the Defendant’s account under the Defendant’s name and 3,500,000 won from the Defendant’s account deposit to the Defendant’s account manager at the time of the transfer to the Defendant’s account, but the Defendant did not know that the amount was 200,000 won from the account deposit.