1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 9, 2009, the Plaintiff acquired a Class 1 ordinary driver’s license (B) and is driving.

B. At around 14:37 on October 28, 2014, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s instant disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s instant driver’s license by applying Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act, on November 28, 2014, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s vehicle signal on the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the bicycle on the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the bicycle (the age of 9) where the victim (the age of 9) was faced with the front part of the front part of the front part of the bicycle, where the Plaintiff driven the front part of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front line, which requires a two-day medical treatment, and where the Plaintiff escaped without any rescue measures for the victim, etc.

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal on January 6, 2015, but was dismissed on March 10, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of evidence Nos. 4 and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff transferred the victim to India immediately after the occurrence of the traffic accident in this case, and examined the victim's body appearance, and the victim's body appearance "to open," and asked the victim "to pay fine" to the victim, while walking in normal form, and recognized that the victim was not the victim, and the plaintiff was able to take relief measures against the victim in order to observe delivery hours. Thus, the plaintiff cannot be viewed as the driver of the escape vehicle. 2) The plaintiff's driver's license is revoked.