logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.05.10 2012나2685
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Eul evidence Nos. 6, Eul evidence No. 11-1 to 4:

The Plaintiff has installed a greenhouse made of plastics and vinyl on the 1,607.4 square meters in Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun (hereinafter “instant land”) and the 1,722 square meters in Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun (hereinafter “C land”), etc. in the vicinity, and cultivated quantant mushrooms.

B. C In order to spread underground water, the pipes and underwater electric motors were installed, and the underground water that was snicked up was supplied to the greenhouses on the ground of the instant land through the waterway pipe. Of the electric wires connected to the said wells and the waterway pipes connected to the instant land, some of the electric wires connected to the said wells and the waterway pipes connected to the instant land was exposed on the ground surface.

(hereinafter “instant electric wires and waterway pipes”). (c)

The Defendant received the “D Road Expansion Works” from the head of the Korea Development and Management Agency of the Republic of Korea, among the “D Road Construction Works on the Go-ju-Yek Sck-Yek-Yek-Yek-Sek-Seng Road,” and accordingly, performed the construction of roads and farming roads in the vicinity of the instant land and C.

Meanwhile, among the instant land, 20.4 square meters and C land, 445.1 square meters among the instant land were divided into the instant construction section on August 12, 2008 and divided into each of the instant land, and the Plaintiff received compensation therefor.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant, while carrying out the instant construction in the vicinity of the instant land and C land, destroyed the above electric wires and waterways by dump trucking the dumping of the instant electric wires and water pipes exposed to the ground surface, and caused damage to the Plaintiff, since the Defendant did not supply the dump trees in the greenhouse of the instant land, as it did not cause damage to the Plaintiff.

arrow