logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.27 2015노5318
사기
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The instant crime is a circumstance unfavorable to the Defendant that: (a) by abusing the system of loan of the fund for the fund for the fund for the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of the fund of

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led each of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant appears to have been involved in the instant crimes because of the economic situation at the time; (c) the Defendant appears to have been taking part in the instant crimes due to the lack of economic circumstances; (d) the Defendant appears to have taken part only of the defrauded money (15 million won even in the statement at the police; (b) the Defendant led the instant crimes according to the instructions of the accomplices; (c) the Defendant took part in the instant crimes; (d) the Defendant had no record of punishment for the same crime; (d) the Defendant appears to have faithfully committed the instant crimes before being arrested; and (e) other circumstances, such as the character, conduct, age, family relationship, motive, background, means, and consequence of the instant crimes, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is somewhat unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is with merit.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the criminal facts of the defendant recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are as stated in the corresponding column of the judgment below, so the Criminal Procedure Act is the same.

arrow