The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to confession and reflect; (b) did not directly exercise physical power against the victim; (c) committed the same crime with the content of the previous crime during the repeated crime period; (d) even if the Defendant avoided the damage of property at the same place prior to the instant crime; and (e) was placed in the summary order, the Defendant committed the same crime at the same place prior to the instant crime; and (e) took into account the unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant in regard to the instant crime; and (e) determined the sentence by taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime; and (e)

The grounds (the background of the crime and the expected repayment) for the sentencing alleged by the defendant appear to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment against the defendant, and the above conditions of the sentencing have changed otherwise.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.