logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.12.21 2017고단2258
국민체육진흥법위반(도박등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Seoul Olympic Games National Sports Promotion Foundation and a person, other than an entrusted business entity, shall not gambling by using the act of offering property or property benefits to persons who win the results of sports promotion by issuing sports promotion votes or similar things to those who win the results.

Nevertheless, from May 1, 2016 to July 23, 2017, the Defendant visited “C”, etc., which is the Internet private sports venue, using computers and smartphones, at the Defendant’s house and near the city room in Busan Shipping Daegu B or 702 from May 1, 2016, and transferred total of KRW 685,252,439 to the Korean bank account, etc. of limited company D, which is the above site’s operating account, from the national bank account, etc. in the name of the Defendant, and used the corresponding game money to use it for betting and predicting the result of various domestic and foreign sports games, and then gambling was performed by receiving a certain percentage of dividends depending on whether there is such a certain amount of dividends.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of two Acts and subordinate statutes to each customer information inquiry table (personal information), internal investigation reports (A account details analysis), investigation reports (Attachment of transaction details), each account transaction details, investigation reports (Attachment of C’s Mebling site’C’s Mebling site’s Mebling page), closures, and closures

1. Article 48 of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 48 subparagraph 3 and 26 (1) of the Act on the Promotion of National Sports for the Selection of Punishment (in all cases, selection of fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Provisional Payment Order is that the sum of the instant paints is not small, and the Defendant has a record of having been suspended from indictment on the previous crime of this case.

However, it is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognizes the facts charged and seriously reflects the facts charged, and that the defendant does not have any criminal records exceeding the same criminal records or fines.

In addition, the defendant's age, sex, and behavior.

arrow