logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.04.13 2017고단1865
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in October by obstructing business operations at the Jeju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 24, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Crimes on January 23, 2017;

A. On January 23, 2017, around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if the victim D would pay the amount normally at the E entertainment shop operated by the victim D in Jeju; and (b) ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcoholic beverages and alcohol from the injured party.

As above, the Defendant did not pay the amount of monetary benefits equivalent to the same amount because he did not pay the amount of money even though he had been provided 5 concurrently with beer, etc. equivalent to the market value of 39,000 won from the victim’s position by deceiving the victim as above.

B. On January 23, 2017, at the place described in paragraph (1) around 23:10 on January 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim D to calculate his/her drinking value; (b) “I have the meaning of why he/she was unable to pay his/her drinking value; and

In the future, I will not be able to say that the gueste is in the future.

“In large interest,” the victim took a bath, and obstructed the victim’s entertainment main business by force by avoiding disturbance.

2. Crimes on January 24, 2017;

A. On January 24, 2017, at around 00:20, the Defendant: (a) committed as if the victim G would pay the normal price at the H cafeteria operated by the victim G at Jeju on January 24, 2017; (b) ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcoholic beverages and alcohol from the injured party.

As above, the Defendant did not pay the amount of monetary benefits equivalent to the same amount because he did not pay the amount of the said amount even though he had been provided with a suit and an explanatory note equivalent to the total market value of 32,000 won from the victim’s position by deceiving the victim.

B. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties has the reason for drinking alcohol at the places described in paragraph 1 at around 00:40.

arrow