The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, at around 21:10 on May 12, 2018, driven a car in D Spanpo area as a duty, and 10-24 (o), a 57-ro o, Suwon-ro, Suwon-si, Sugwon-si, the road near No. 10-24 (o), No. 10-24 (o), No. 57 (o), Sugwon-si, an apartment room in the high-dong industrial complex, proceeds at a flive speed depending on one lane of the second apartment road, and was negligent in moving the two-lane, due to occupational negligence before and after the change to the two-lane, led the victim E (71) who was driving in accordance with the same direction and proceeded with the two-lane driving of the said Spanpo area, and did not take necessary measures, such as rescue and relief of the said passenger and the said person who did not suffer any injury to the said flock, such as the victim and the said flock immediately.

2. Determination:

A. "When the driver of an accident runs away without taking measures under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding and abetting the injured person," under Article 5-3 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes refers to a case where the driver of an accident runs away from the scene before performing his/her duty under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding and abetting the injured person although he/she was aware of the fact that the injured person was killed and injured (see Supreme Court Decision 94Do1850 delivered on September 13, 1994). B. According to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the following facts are acknowledged.

① The instant accident is an accident in which the Defendant, while driving along one lane on the road along which the instant accident occurred, rapidly changed the vehicle along the two lanes to the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the part on the left side of the damaged vehicle driven along the two lanes is shocked.

vehicles of sea and damaged vehicles.