beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The Civil Hunting Co., Ltd. is running a car siren business. On August 2015, the Defendant leased the Citro poppy DS3 vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) owned by the Civil Hunting Constitution to the Defendant. The instant vehicle is a vehicle using diesel as fuel. The Defendant is a vehicle using gasoline in the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant mixed-use vehicle”), and the Plaintiff is a public-private partnership manager following the commencement of rehabilitation procedures. There is no dispute between the parties. Thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused to the instant vehicle due to the instant mixed-use vehicle, since the Defendant neglected to verify the type of fuel used while gasing the instant vehicle, and paid the fuel corresponding thereto. However, the Defendant is liable to compensate for the damages caused to the Plaintiff due to the instant mixed-use vehicle.
2. Scope of and limitation on liability for damages.
A. According to the evidence No. 6, the Plaintiff paid KRW 5,289,570 to repair the instant vehicle.
나. 휴차손해비 4,963,296원(= 시트로엥 1일당 렌트비용 190,896원 × 26일) 1) 원고는 이 사건 차량의 렌트비용이 1일당 335,000원이라고 주장하고 있으나, 을 제2호증의 기재에 의하면, 피고가 대여한 기간(2015. 8. 3. 17:00부터 2015. 8. 5. 12:30까지)의 렌트비가 346,000원이었던 사실이 인정되므로, 이에 의하면 1일당 렌트비용은 190,896원(= 346,000원 ÷ 43.5시간 × 24시간, 원미만 버림)이라고 할 것이다. 2) 또한 원고는 이 사건 혼유사고로 인하여 2015. 8. 5.부터 수리가 완료된 2015. 9. 15.까지 42일간 휴차손해가 발생하였다고 주장하나, 갑 제9호증의 기재에 의하면, 이 사건 차량이 2015. 8. 5. 입고되었는데, 2015. 9. 14.에서야 수리작업이 시작되고, 2015. 9. 15. 수리가 완료되었으며, 이는 해당부품의 견적 및...