1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On December 27, 1994, the Plaintiff acquired a driver’s license (Class 1 ordinary. number B) for a motor vehicle.

On August 15, 2014, at around 16:20 on August 16, 2014, the Plaintiff driven a low-priced car, and operated the road at the entrance of the Jeju-si village linked to Jeju-si to the left-hand turn from the new luminous-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiff did not immediately stop to the driver of the affected vehicle for about two weeks after causing the injury to the climatic base and tensions, to the driver of the affected vehicle, to the driver F (n, 37 years old) of the affected vehicle, and to rescue the victim or to remove traffic obstacles by making a stop immediately after destroying the damaged vehicle’s property worth KRW 429,543, and to the driver of the affected vehicle for about two weeks of treatment. The Plaintiff did not take measures such as aiding the victim or removing traffic obstacles.

On September 3, 2014, the Plaintiff agreed not to want the legal responsibility and punishment for the instant accident with the driver of the victimized Vehicle, but not to hold a civil or criminal liability in the future.

On September 18, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition revoking the Plaintiff’s driver’s license on October 1, 2014 on the ground that the Plaintiff caused a traffic accident and did not perform its duty to take relief measures and obligation to report despite having injured persons.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed it on February 24, 2015.

On the other hand, the prosecutor of the Jeju District Prosecutors' Office was the Jeju District Court No. 2015 High Court Decision No. 201290, the Plaintiff violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.