logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.01.22 2013고정618
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 High Court Decision 618]

1. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a BH car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act.

On April 15, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license on April 21, 2013, and proceeded along two-lanes from the ethic ecological tunnel to the side of the ethic, ecological and tunnel.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to his/her name.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim BI (the age of 45) to turn to the left in accordance with the new subparagraph due to the negligence of disregarding and proceeding the vehicle stop signal, which the Defendant driven by the victim BYFI (the age of 45) with the front part of the said car, the lower part of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, injured the above victim with salt and tensions that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and inflicted injury upon the victim BK (n, 36 years old), who was on board the head of the above YF rocketing car operation for approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time injured the victim BK (n, who was on board the said YF Engine) by using dynasiums and tensions of the bones, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and damaged the above YF rocketing car by using the repair cost equivalent to KRW 510,859, including the exchange

2. No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a BH car without mandatory insurance, such as Paragraph 1.

[2013 High Court Decision 825]

3. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a frens vehicle in the amount of frens vehicle.

The Defendant around 00:05 on June 28, 2013.

arrow