1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for this case by the court of first instance as to this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, thereby citing it as is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

[Supplementary judgment] The defendant asserts that the plaintiff's symptoms have already been fixed in the trial and no more active treatment is required, and that the injury or disease alleged by the plaintiff is not subject to additional medical care or medical care, but merely a supplementary treatment for relaxation of pain.

In addition to the requirements of the medical care under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, it is recognized that there is a proximate causal relation between the first injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury at the time of the completion of the medical care, and there is a medical opinion that there is a medical opinion that the symptoms of the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury can be expected by the additional medical care as they have aggravated compared to the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and the injury and injury

(See Supreme Court Decision 94Nu12326 delivered on September 15, 1995, etc.). Based on these legal principles, considering the following factors: (a) the Plaintiff’s accident and treatment process acknowledged by the first instance court and the evidence adopted by this court; (b) the process of granting approval for additional medical care; (c) the inquiry results on the head of the first instance regional university hospital; (d) the results of the physical commission (including the results of factual inquiry); and (e) the results of the medical examination entrustment to the head of the Korean National University Hospital; and (e) the results of the medical examination entrustment to the head of the Korean National University Hospital (including the results of factual inquiry); and (e) the Plaintiff’s early active treatment of the pain cell is critical inasmuch as the pain of the Plaintiff’s pain gradually aggravated and may cause a dynamic change in the