The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal by defense counsel;

A. Fact-misunderstanding (1) The Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act on March 11, 2013 with F along with his meals; (b) sent coffee to the digital segment through the Defendant’s car in the light name ICT; and (c) did not commit an indecent act by force against F after setting the Defendant’s car at the light name; (d) parked a car in the J located near the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and attempted to put F to ki on F, but (e) did not commit an indecent act by force, by forcing F to resign, even though the Defendant was refused to leave the f, bucks, and bucks.

The Defendant and F had the same workplace and had a relationship with him from April 2012, and had been going to travel more than twice as one night, and F had been forced to commit an indecent act.

On January 31, 2013, the statement made by F, on March 11, 2013, 2013, F, when the statement was made, F, on April 4, 2013, 201, had a sexual intercourse with the Defendant, and thereafter, up to October 2013, he did not travel with the Defendant. The statement made by F, on March 21, 2013, that the Defendant was forced to commit an indecent act from the Defendant at around 21:0, is not consistent with the date and time and time of the movement, is not consistent with the Defendant at the time and time, and is not consistent with the F, in view of the following: F, the statement made by F, when the Defendant was forced to commit an indecent act within a passenger car for about 2 hours, around 21:30, 2013, was made by using the Defendant’s moving path and passenger vehicle, the Defendant’s surrounding equipment and condition of the Defendant’s entrance, and its credibility and state of the Defendant’s spouse’s request.

The recording records submitted by F, the text messages sent by the Defendant and F are merely the contents of the Defendant’s apology in order to reach a F that excessively makessatis, not the fact that the Defendant committed an indecent act against F.