A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On May 1, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on December 6, 2017.

[2018 Highest 2292]

1. On May 21, 2018, around 09:30 on May 21, 2018, the Defendant used a computer for about seven hours as if the victim D was to pay the user fee in the “E” room operated by the victim D on the fourth floor of the Busan East-gu C Building, Busan, and used the computer for approximately seven hours. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the user fee.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) used the computer with the permission of the victim to use the computer; and (c) did not pay KRW 11,200 to the victim; and (d) acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On May 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed as if the Defendant was the type H of the Defendant at the G District in the Don Police Station G District located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, on May 21, 2018; (b) stated the Defendant’s letter of confirmation to arrest a flagrant offender in the name of H, stating the Defendant’s name, resident registration number, etc., from H, in the letter of confirmation; and (c) written H’s signature next to the letter of confirmation.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged H’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 2, sent to the above I a letter of confirmation to arrest a flagrant offender with a forged name as if the true signature was written.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a forged private signature.

[2018 Highest 2709] On May 16, 2018, the Defendant used the time room in the above case for about 13 hours from around 23:00 to around 23:00 of the day when the Defendant was committed as if he would normally pay the use fee to the victim L, an employee of the above room, and used the time room in the above case for about 13 hours.

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he uses the time in the above room.

The defendant.