logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.07.24 2019고단236
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on November 13, 2018, and is currently under probation period after the judgment became final and conclusive on November 21, 2018.

1. On March 2, 2019, at around 23:00, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by destroying the victim’s property, such as studio 2 at entertainment tavern 2 operated by the victim C (the 57 years of age) in Gangwon-si (the 57 years of age), on the ground that the Plaintiff was under the influence of alcohol and was able to singled with singing machines, etc., set up on the table, and attaching devices for singing machines and monitors and microphones at the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, and then destroying the victim’s property by destroying the unfolded lids of market price, which is the victim’s ownership in the toilet.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business, on the grounds that he was under the influence of alcohol at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) and on the grounds that he was under the influence of alcohol, took a heavy bath, and collected beer’s disease located in the table, etc. for a period of about one hour, thereby obstructing the victim C’s main shop business by getting the customers out of the outside, and by force.

3. On March 2, 2019, at around 23:45, the Defendant committed an assault, on his hand, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) on March 2, 2019, in order to encourage the Defendant to stop a disturbance and to return home to the Defendant, the border E (the age of 28) belonging to the Chuncheon Police Station D Zone D District, which called “Ising customers to walk within the main place, hacking things.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and C;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to On-site photographs and damaged parts photographs, fadicam reproductions;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow