The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two months and by imprisonment for two months for a crime under paragraph (1) of the same Article.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 4, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of noise measurement), etc. at the Changwon District Court was sentenced to 1 year of suspension of execution on October 15, 201, and the decision of invalidation of suspension of execution became final and conclusive on February 20, 201, and the execution of the above sentence was terminated at the Changwon District Court on October 11, 201. On January 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of noise measurement) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Changwon Prison Prison on January 21, 2013.

On September 18, 2014, the Defendant sentenced the Changwon District Court to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Changwon Prison on January 16, 2015. On April 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for the obstruction of performance of official duties in the Changwon District Court’s smuggling Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 12, 2015.

In addition, on February 14, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months with prison labor for the preparation of qualification documents in the Changwon District Court's smuggling support on May 3, 2019, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 3, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant was aware of the fact that he was the pro-child of B, and that he was disqualified as a recipient of zero tax when he purchased a vehicle in his name, and was willing to purchase a car to be used in his name without the consent of B.

1. On February 22, 2013, the Defendant entered “B” in the column of the assignee of the vehicle transfer certificate concerning Egallon-2 automobiles for the purpose of uttering in C located at Pgallon-si around February 22, 2013, and stamped B’s name and seal affixed by the Defendant on his name.

At the same time and place, the Defendant continued to use the certificate of the transfer of a motor vehicle under the name B, as if it were a document duly formed, to a non-employee of D, who was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant is named B, a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.