1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,228,408 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 18, 2017 to January 16, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On April 18, 2017, around 06:30 on April 18, 2017, the Plaintiff was taking the Plaintiff’s pet dog and satis in front of Busan-gun, Busan-gun, the Plaintiff suffered pressure 12 pressure satis, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”). In the course of the Plaintiff’s control, the Plaintiff was able to attack the Defendant’s Jatat dog and the Plaintiff’s petat dog, which was keyed by the Defendant, and was in the process of the Plaintiff’s control (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant did not enroat the fat, etc., but did not enroat, etc., and laid the gate out of the house. However, at the time of the instant accident, the Defendant laid the fat, which was going out of the house.

【Reason for Recognition】 Each entry and video of the evidence of subparagraphs A through 7 (including, if any, the number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The possessor of the judgment animal is liable to compensate another person for damage caused by the animal. According to the above facts of recognition, the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the defendant who neglected to take appropriate measures to prevent the defendant from threatening the people out of the house, and thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case, unless there are special circumstances.

However, as to the instant accident, the Plaintiff did not safely avoid the matat and was negligent for itself, the Defendant’s liability ratio is limited to 70% in consideration of this.

2. In principle, the period for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than won shall be discarded, and the current value at the time of the accident shall be calculated by deducting the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 percent per month.

It is rejected that the parties' arguments have not been presented separately.

【Ground of Recognition】 Each entry of Evidence Nos. 8 through 18, and against the Director of the D Hospital of this Court.