logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.09.04 2013고단2213
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles C;

At around 02:20 on April 19, 2013, the Defendant continued to play a internship in front of the New Zealand, which was located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, with a shooting distance away from the main construction distance.

Since there is a zone where a U-turn is prohibited, a person engaged in driving duties has a duty of care to prevent accidents by making a U-turn in order to prevent interference with other vehicles by checking well the right and the right in the zone where a U-turn is possible.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and brought about a second-lane due to negligence in the course of business, which led to the head aspect of the E-si driven by D, which was driven by the defendant, as the front side of the vehicle driven by the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant got about two weeks back to the victim F (year 26) who was on board a vehicle driven by D through occupational negligence as seen above, and, at the same time, did not immediately stop the above damaged vehicle and take necessary measures, even though the Defendant damaged the above damaged vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,973,956.

2. A person who has purchased a motor vehicle registered in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act shall file an application for registration of transfer of ownership with the Mayor/Do Governor within fifteen days;

Nevertheless, the defendant purchased the above Cro-car purchased around 201 and did not register the transfer of ownership.

3. No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on the road; and

Nevertheless, on April 19, 2013, the Defendant operated a Crops car that was not mandatory insurance in front of the New Zealand, which was located in the Suwon-si Transferdong in Suwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow